Tommy Ryan: You can’t keep us locked up in here like animals - the ship’s bloody sinking!
May 9th, 2009 Posted in Company Gossip, Management Screwups, Payroll, PirateGirl | 1 Comment »If you’re a Titanic fan, you recognize the title. It’s from the scene where they won’t let the people from steerage out from the bottom of the ship, while the first-class passengers are all boarding lifeboats as the ship takes on water.
Every time there is hope that the USS Sinking Ship won’t, in fact, sink - something else comes along. We go along smoothly for a couple of months, with tightened belts and a skeleton crew, and every other paycheck being paper instead of direct deposit. Small indications, but ones that should not be ignored, given the company’s history.
Last month, there was another round of layoffs. The highly-paid friend of the BMOC finally went. I feel bad only because the economy is such that it isn’t easy to find replacement employment these days. Not because his leaving was such a loss to the company that we are having a hard time filling his shoes; it isn’t as if the man was doing much - or at least that is how it appeared to those of us in steerage.
During the call that announced the layoffs, there was mention of furloughs or other cost-cutting measures. Personally I didn’t like the loss of income but in typical Pollyanna fashion I didn’t give it a lot of thought. It wasn’t as if the BMOC spent a lot of time discussing the possibilities, it was a fleeting mention in the midst of a lot of other heavy information.
Until last week when we got THE email. The one that said “Hey, do us this favor and take this 10% cut in pay. Your line managers have been instructed to be flexible with you regarding your scheduling in return for doing us this favor.”
As is typical with emails from the BMOC, that vague sentence was not further explained. It prompted speculation among those of us in steerage. But not for long, because an hour later, the #2BMOC called a meeting with those who work in my business unit. It was an interesting meeting, but we were assured that four 10 hour days would be possible in order to allow us to have 3 day weekends, or maybe another day of working from home for those who work in offices. Astoundingly, after being asked, they expected no attrition as a result of the pay cut.
Seriously? Seriously.
I thought I was a Pollyanna. Apparently I’m not alone. I’m just not in first class being a Pollyanna.
I’m guessing that if the rumors about how ugly the meeting with the other business unit got are true, management got a major education in a quick way. Rumors are that it was an incredibly unpleasant meeting.
Ooookay. Moving along, it turns out that we couldn’t just tell them what we wanted to do for our newly-acquired flex time. We could request it, and the requests would be considered. And then the day of the decision about those requests came and went and we’d heard nothing.
People started asking questions, and the questions were answered. The answers weren’t pleasant and they filtered down to the masses. It seems that they didn’t expect people to want to take advantage of four 10’s.
Or something like that. I’m not sure what the motivation for the next set of lies was, but what they were telling us was that what was meant by that sentence in the email from the BMOC was not how BMOC#2 and BMOC#4 interpreted it and their interpretation was wrong.
Those people who were not in the know that BMOC#2 and BMOC#4 helped write that email might be buying it. But if you help to write an email, you pretty much know what it means. There were DAYS of discussion surrounding that email - there was no room for misinterpretation by the ones who were expected to be flexible.
The second lie was that HR wasn’t going to go for it. We don’t have an HR department. At least not anymore. They were the first to feel the axe against their necks, over a year ago. We have an HR person. And she is part-time. And guess what? She works for the very people who were now back-tracking on their “concessions” that were to make the pay cut more palatable. What they were proposing is in no way illegal, and I am pretty sure that it doesn’t jeopardize the salaried status of any employees to work four 10’s (turning them back into hourly), so the logic is just about the same as the Titanic only having half the number of lifeboats required to save all the persons on the ship.
The official email comes out, and their next offer is four 9’s, with day 5 consisting of 4 work hours and 4 on-call hours.
You can do the math, right?
We work 40 hours, and as a thank you for taking a pay cut, we get to be on-call for an extra 4 hours.
So let’s re-cap:
- They stopped tuition reimbursement.
- They stopped matching our 401(k)’s.
- They didn’t tell us about it for months, and now are in danger of federal sanctions because they are STILL behind in what they owe us.
- Apparently they stopped paying taxes because there is a large IRS bill.
- Expense reimbursement is almost non-existent or takes months and months to arrive.
- There have been 3 rounds of layoffs, with a starting workforce of about 120. I would say we are down to approximately 30 employees now.
- The loss of even one employee out of the ones that are left might not be the equivalent of hitting the iceberg (depending on the employee) but it would absolutely have detrimental effects.
- We have been subjected to a 10% pay cut, effective at least through the end of the year.
- Even the BMOC’s don’t expect the pay cut to be reversed by January 2010.
- We were promised flex time in exchange for the pay cut, as long as our level of productivity didn’t decrease. Instead, we were delivered the chance to work even more hours in exchange for less pay.